The field of Humanitarian Assistance has become increasingly complex in every
aspect. Since the end of the cold war one can observe multiple changes – increase in
humanitarian action, increased number and variation of humanitarian actors, proliferation
of tasks between different actors (e.g. militaries as relief and developmental
actors), professionalization of relief aid, etc. Bluntly speaking, the times
when the Red Cross and States were the only humanitarian actors and when
international humanitarian law alone was sufficiently covering emergency situations,
are long gone.
All these developments were accompanied by a slow adaptation of international
(humanitarian) and regional law. The fact that the International Federation of the
Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFCR) is developing a corpus of cases, legal case
studies and legal documents relevant for emergency situations, what is called
international disaster response law, shows that a coherent body of law is far from
being in existence. The legal reality of international law pertaining to emergency
response is rather broadly spread over various international legal fields and related
documents. International humanitarian law (IHL) is far from covering the subject of
humanitarian aid, beginning with the fact that it covers only armed conflicts and not
purely natural disasters.
1